CJ
101 on-line – Criminal Justice
Spring
2010
|
Name: Karen Shinham |
Office: B216 |
|
E-mail:
kshinham@frederick.edu |
Phone
Number: 443-812-8613 |
|
Office
Hours: N/A |
Campus Mail
Box Number: |
Course Information:
|
Credits: 3 |
Last Day
to Drop: |
|
Prerequisites: EN 52 |
Co-requisites: |
|
Meeting
Day(s): N/A |
Meeting
Time(s): N/A |
|
|
|
Course Description:
|
Presents
a history of criminal justice, with emphasis on English antecedents important
to the administration of justice in the |
Core Learning Outcomes:
By the
completion of the course students will:
|
1. Demonstrate understanding of the 3
major components of the Criminal Justice System; |
|
2. Describe the methods of gathering
data in crime and its limitations |
|
3. Explain the contributions of
English Common Law to the U.S. Judicial Process; and |
|
4. Identify career opportunities in
the Criminal Justice Field |
Evaluation Methods:
|
Chapter Exams: There will be two exams in this
class. The first exam, which will be
proctored, will be given during week 7 and may include multiple choice, short
answer and essay questions. The first exam
will be taken at the testing center.
The second exam will be taken on-line.
This exam will consist of definition questions and essay questions. Students will need their student ID to take
the exam at the testing center. There
will be no makeup unless a student misses an exam for an emergency, death
etc. The student must contact the
Instructor prior to the exam or shortly thereafter to discuss his/her
situation and to present documentation.
It is up to the Instructor’s discretion whether a makeup will be
allowed. Discussion
Board online:
The Discussion Board
is the most important area for student-teacher interaction in the Blackboard
classroom. Each week with the exception of the two test weeks, there
will be one (1) discussion regarding
the “Muddiest Point” of the assigned readings. “Muddiest Point” is the part that you,
individually, found complicated, confusing, or just unclear. Each student is required to post his/her
“muddiest point” and then review other student’s posts and make an effort to
answer or clarify their muddiest point.
I will label the discussion “Week 1, 2, etc.” This will make it easier for you to track
the discussions. Each student is required to post their own “muddiest
point,” respond to at least two (2) fellow students about their “muddiest
point,” and answer any follow up questions I may ask regarding your
initial response. Your responses should be in paragraph format and
although the conferences are somewhat informal, spelling and grammar are
still important. “I agree”
will not count as a post. Each week’s
discussion is worth 15 points, with the final week worth 20 points. Remember,
discussion participation is 20% of your grade. Your posts should
indicate that you have completed the assigned reading and reviewed other
student’s posts. I will not put a
minimum word count on your post, however, anything less than one well
developed paragraph will not be given credit.
Each week will begin
on Monday (I will have it on line by Sunday for those who like to start early)
and close on the following Monday. That means you have seven (7) days
to complete your discussion board work. Nothing posted after that time
will be credited. Early posts create more discussion, so I do encourage
posting early in the week. Criminal Justice Project: (200 Points)You may choose one (1) of the following for
your project. DUE 5/10 Practitioner Interview
Project: You will interview an individual in the Criminal Justice
Field. The interview will consist of
asking questions related to the person’s career in the Criminal Justice
Field. You will then present the
answers in a three page double spaced paper. You can make up your own questions, but
focus on discretion, how and why they make particular decisions, what
guidelines exist to guide their decisions, your opinion about the information
gained, and then how you believe each officer's personal life experiences
effect that decision making. Begin with a (1) cover page with your name, project
title, course, and date submitted. (2) Provide background information on the
selected person; (3) obtain the person's views on the criminal justice
system, whether it works, doesn't work, and what he/she believes to be the
future of the criminal justice system. This is to be in a narrative
format, i.e., what you learned as the result of speaking with this person. Do
not submit a "question-answer" paper. (4) Your analysis of what the
person has to say should also compare and contrast relevant sections/chapters
of the text or outside sources. Papers must be typed, double-spaced, and a
minimum of three pages. When using the text or other sources, they must be
properly documented and referenced. This "Works Cited" page does
not count toward the page total. Criminal
Court Visit: Visit a criminal
court session. Depending on when you attend, you could see a series of cases
or one case. Write your reflections on what you observed and how the
proceedings affect the administration of justice. Papers must be a minimum of
three, typed and double-spaced pages. Your report should include the
following:
POLICE RIDE-ALONG - This is an observational assignment that focuses on the
use of discretion by police officers who patrol our communities. The
objective of this assignment is to observe who is stopped and why? Who is
arrested and why? How does the use of discretion affect the patrol officer's
job? Papers must be a minimum of three, typed and double-spaced pages.
Include cover page
listing your name, project title, course, and date submitted, a an introductory paragraph that includes the purpose of
the paper and information concerning assignment of the officer, the
department with which he/she is employed, and the date, time, and duration of
the ride-along. Using a narrative format, you should provide the officer's
views on the use of discretion and then follow this with your observations
and conclusions. When using the text or other
sources, they must be properly documented and referenced. Homework Assignments:
There
are three homework assignments. Each homework
assignment must be two to three pages double spaced. You must submit the assignment on the due
dates. There will be no exceptions. Homework Assignment #1 (100
points) DUE 2/13 COURT CASES In discussing
procedural due process, several cases are considered landmark and provide
additional explanation of the bill of rights (for the purpose of this
exercise, also included is the 14th amendment). Choose one case and
follow the guidelines below:
Papers must be typed,
double-spaced, and a minimum of two pages that covers the case brief. Cases 1.
Lawrence v. Texas (2003) 2. Miranda
v. Arizona (1966) 3. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) 4.
Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) 5. Gideon
v. Wainwright (1963) 6. Miranda
v. Arizona (1966) 7. Katz v.
United States (1967) 8. in re Gault (1967) 9.
Tennessee v. Garner (1985) 10. Graham v.
Connor (1989) 11. Maryland v.
Wilson (1997) Formatting Guidelines
Homework Assignment #2 (100
points) DUE 3/20 THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE
SYSTEM AS ENTERTAINMENT CRITIQUE There are a number
of programs that showcase the criminal justice system on cable TV. As
opposed to Law and Order, CSI, and the like,
these programs purport to be fact-based. For this assignment, you
may choose any two segments from the following television programs.
Note: The following are examples: American Justice and City
Confidential If a student finds another program that meets
the criteria, simply email the instructor for permission to use that specific
program. Critique
Requirements and Formatting Papers must be a
minimum of two (2), double-spaced, typed pages, and must include the
following:
Homework Assignment #3(100
points)DUE 4/24 Power Point Presentation The
issue of the death penalty has been debated for centuries. After reading Chapter 12, choose a side,
for or against the death penalty, and prepare a short persuasive presentation
that would convince someone with a neutral viewpoint on the issue to your way
of thinking. The power point should be
a minimum of 10 slides, but no more than 15 slides presenting your position
on this controversial issue. Include
the following:
|
Text(s) for Course:
|
Schmallegar, Frank “Criminal Justice Today”,
10th edition |
|
|
|
Evaluation Methods: Tests / Papers / Projects |
Point Value |
Final Grade Scale |
|
2
examinations |
150 points each |
A = 900-1000 points |
|
Criminal
Justice Project |
200 points |
B= 800-899 points |
|
Discussion
Board (13) 15 pts each |
200 pts
(weekly-25 pts.) |
C = 700-799 points |
|
Online
Homework (3) Assignments 100 pts each |
300
points |
D = 600-699 points F =
599 and below |
Progress
Report:
|
Students
may review their progress at any time by entering the grade book feature in
Blackboard. |
TOPICAL
OUTLINE
|
Class |
Date |
Subject |
Content |
|
1 |
1/24 |
Introduction
to course What is
Criminal Justice? |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
2 |
1/31 |
The
Crime Picture, Criminal Law and The Search for Causes |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
3 |
2/7 |
Criminal
Law |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
4 |
2/14 |
History
and Structure of Policing and Purpose and Organization |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
5 |
2/21 |
Policing
- Legal Aspects and Issues and Challenges |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
6 |
2/28 |
The
Courts – Structure and Participants and |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
7 |
3/7 |
Pretrial
activities and Sentencing AND Sentencing Mid Term
Exam |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
8 |
3/14 |
Corrections
– Probation, Parole and Community Corrections AND Prison Life |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
9 |
3/21 |
Prisons
and Jails |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
10 |
4/4 |
Juvenile
Justice |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
11 |
4/11 |
Drugs
and Crime |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
12 |
4/18 |
Terrorism
and Multinational Criminal Justice |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
13 |
4/25 |
The
Future of Criminal Justice |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
14 |
5/2 |
Wrap up
and Review |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
15 |
5/8 |
Take on-line
exam |
Reading/Assignments
|