|
Frederick
Community College CJ 101 – Criminal Justice SPRING 2012 |
||
|
Class begins: 1/30/12 |
Class ends: 05/19-12 |
Last Day to Withdraw:04/16/12 |
|
Instructor Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
Karen Shinham |
Office:
|
|
E-mail:
kshinham@frederick.edu |
Phone Number:
443-812-8613 443-812-8613 |
|
Contact Hours: email and by appointment for in-person meeting |
Campus Mail Box #: |
|
Course Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
Credits:
3 |
|
|
On-campus Meetings: N/A |
On-campus Exams: 1 |
|
Prerequisites:
EN 52 or ESL l99 |
|
|
Course Description: |
|
|
|
Presents
a history of criminal justice, with emphasis on English antecedents important
to the administration of justice in the United States. Introduces the United States constitution
and Supreme Court decisions affecting individual rights and law enforcement
practices. Includes career orientation
through an analysis of criminal justice agencies. |
|
Core Learning Outcomes: |
|
|
|
Upon completion of this course
students will demonstrate 1. Demonstrate understanding of the 3 major
components of the Criminal Justice System; 2.
Describe
the methods of gathering data in crime and its limitations; 3.
Explain
the contribution of English Common Law to the U.S. Judicial Process; Identify career opportunities in
criminal justice. |
|
Instructional Methods: |
|
|
Chapter Exams: There will be two exams in this
class. The first exam, which will be
proctored, will be given during week 7 and may include multiple choice, short
answer and essay questions. The first
exam will be taken at the testing center.
The second exam will be taken on-line.
This exam will consist of definition questions and essay questions. Students will need their student ID to take
the exam at the testing center. There
will be no makeup unless a student misses an exam for an emergency, death
etc. The student must contact the
Instructor prior to the exam or shortly thereafter to discuss his/her situation
and to present documentation. it is up to the Instructor’s discretion whether a makeup
will be allowed.
Discussion
Board online:
The Discussion Board is
the most important area for student-teacher interaction in the Blackboard
classroom. Each week with the exception of the two test weeks, there will
be one (1) discussion
regarding the “Muddiest Point” of the assigned readings. “Muddiest Point” is the part that you,
individually, found complicated, confusing, or just unclear. Each student is required to post his/her
“muddiest point” and then review other student’s posts and make an effort to
answer or clarify their muddiest point.
I will label the discussion “Week 1, 2, etc.” This will make it easier for you to track the
discussions. Each student is required to post their own “muddiest point,”
respond to at least two (2)
fellow students about their “muddiest point,” and answer any follow up
questions I may ask regarding your initial response. Your responses
should be in paragraph format and although the conferences are somewhat
informal, spelling and grammar are still important. “I agree” will not count as a post. Each week’s discussion is worth 15 points,
with the final week worth 20 points. Remember, discussion participation is
20% of your grade. Your posts should indicate that you have completed
the assigned reading and reviewed other student’s posts. I will not put a minimum word count on your
post, however, anything less than one well developed paragraph will not be
given credit.
Each week will begin on
Monday (I will have it on line by Sunday for those who like to start early) and
close on the following Monday. That means you have seven (7) days to
complete your discussion board work. Nothing posted after that time will
be credited. Early posts create more discussion, so I do encourage
posting early in the week.
Criminal
Justice Project: (200 Points)You may
choose one (1) of the
following for your project.
Practitioner
Interview Project: You will interview an individual in the Criminal Justice
Field. The interview will consist of
asking questions related to the person’s career in the Criminal Justice
Field. You will then present the answers
in a three page double spaced paper.
You can make up your own questions, but focus on discretion, how and why
they make particular decisions, what guidelines exist to guide their decisions,
your opinion about the information gained, and then how you believe each
officer's personal life experiences effect that decision making. Begin with a (1) cover page with your name, project title,
course, and date submitted. (2) Provide background information on the selected
person; (3) obtain the person's views on the criminal justice system, whether
it works, doesn't work, and what he/she believes to be the future of the
criminal justice system. This is to be in a narrative format, i.e., what you
learned as the result of speaking with this person. Do not submit a
"question-answer" paper. (4) Your analysis of what the person has to
say should also compare and contrast relevant sections/chapters of the text or
outside sources. Papers must be typed, double-spaced, and a minimum of three
pages. When using the text or other sources, they must be properly documented and
referenced. This "Works Cited" page does not count toward the page
total.
Criminal Court Visit: Visit a
criminal court session. Depending on when you attend, you could see a series of
cases or one case. Write your reflections on what you observed and how the
proceedings affect the administration of justice. Papers must be a minimum of
three, typed and double-spaced pages.
Your report should include the
following:
Homework Assignment #1 (100 points)
COURT CASES
In discussing procedural
due process, several cases are considered landmark and provide additional
explanation of the bill of rights (for the purpose of this exercise, also
included is the 14th amendment).
Choose one case and
follow the guidelines below:
Papers must be typed,
double-spaced, and a minimum of two pages that covers the case brief.
Cases
1. Lawrence
v. Texas (2003)
2. Miranda
v. Arizona (1966)
3. Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
4. Escobedo
v. Illinois (1964)
5. Gideon v.
Wainwright (1963)
6. Miranda
v. Arizona (1966)
7. Katz v.
United States (1967)
8. in re Gault (1967)
9. Tennessee
v. Garner (1985)
10. Graham v.
Connor (1989)
11. Maryland v.
Wilson (1997)
Formatting Guidelines
Homework Assignment #2 (100 points)
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE
SYSTEM AS ENTERTAINMENT CRITIQUE
There are a number
of programs that showcase the criminal justice system on cable TV. As
opposed to Law and Order, CSI, and the like, these programs
purport to be fact-based.
For this assignment, you
may choose any two segments from the following television programs.
Note: The following are examples: American Justice and City
Confidential
If a student finds another program that meets
the criteria, simply email the instructor for permission to use that specific
program.
Critique
Requirements and Formatting
Papers must be a minimum
of two (2), double-spaced, typed pages, and must include the following:
Homework Assignment #3(100 points)
Power Point Presentation
The
issue of the death penalty has been debated for centuries. After reading Chapter 12, choose a side, for
or against the death penalty, and prepare a short persuasive presentation that
would convince someone with a neutral viewpoint on the issue to your way of
thinking. The power point should be a
minimum of 10 slides, but no more than 15 slides presenting your position on
this controversial issue. Include the
following:
|
|
|
How is this course
organized: |
|
|
|
|
|
Text(s) for Course:
|
|
Progress Report: |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Students
may review their progress at any time by entering the grade book feature in
Blackboard. |
|||
|
Evaluation Methods: |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Evaluation Methods: Tests / Papers / Projects |
Point Value |
Final Grade Scale |
|
2
examinations |
150 points each |
A = 900-1000 points |
|
Criminal
Justice Project |
200 points |
B= 800-899 points |
|
Discussion
Board (13) 15 pts each |
200 pts (weekly-25 pts.) |
C = 700-799 points |
|
Online
Homework (3) Assignments 100 pts each |
300
points |
D = 600-699 points F =
599 and below |
|
Student
Services |
|
|
|
A variety of services are
available to assist students in succeeding at FCC. Students can learn more
about these services by visiting the Student Services web page: http://www.frederick.edu/student_services/index.aspx. Students with disabilities who are
in need of accommodations or who have questions related to disabilities
services should contact the Services for Students with Disabilities (SSD)
office at 301-846-2408 301-846-2408 .
Students can learn more about these services by visiting the Services for
Students with Disabilities web page: http://www.frederick.edu/student_services/disability.aspx. |
|
Participation Policy: |
|
By
registering for a Web-based course, you have made a commitment to participate
in your course Discussion Board as well as other online activities. Please
plan to participate regularly. You will note in the grading policy that your online participation
counts toward your final grade. The
weekly Discussion Board will normally require you to respond directly to a
posted question or idea and to comment on responses from your classmates. The
goal is, naturally, to discuss and exchange ideas. When you participate in
online discussions, practice professional and personal courtesy. Although
source citation is not necessary in the discussions, the ideas of other
people and resources that are of value should be identified. Weekly
Discussion Board will be posted on Saturdays, and each week's responses are
due by midnight (eastern time) the following Monday. Responses may not
be submitted late; students who have not participated within the time
allotted will receive a grade of zero for that week's participation. Full
credit for the conference each week requires that you interact with your
classmates. Please participate early whenever you can. The
quality of a discussion greatly diminishes when everyone tries to submit
their responses in the last couple days. You must address the
topic of the discsussion and then respond to at
least two other student posts. "I agree" does not count as a
response to other students posts. Successful
progress through this course depends on reasonable self-pacing and regular
online participation. If you have problems keeping up, contact your
instructor. Substance
of Responses Your responses should exhibit
evidence of critical thinking and analysis. What is meant by substantive?
This is certainly a fair question. A quick, but perhaps not very helpful
answer might be that your instructor will know it when he or she sees it.
More concrete advice would be to keep in mind the tried-and-true journalism
questions: who, what, where, when, why, and how? In order to be considered substantive,
a comment or paper must meet a number of criteria. First of all, it must
clearly show that you have read the required readings. It must not simply
repeat what you have read, but show that you fully understand it. If your answer
adds something to your instructor's understanding of the issue at hand, then
it is most likely substantive. The ability to write substantively
is one of several critical skills that criminal justice managers must learn
in order to succeed. Others include the ability to speak and write well and
to think critically. Additional
Issues Concerning the Quality and Length of Responses The quality and length of your
responses are considered when your instructor is determining how your
postings contribute to the class. If a response is too long or too wordy, it
may prove difficult to read, and therefore, it may not significantly
contribute to the class's understanding of the subject. The same may be true
when a response is too abbreviated this, too, may make it difficult for other
readers to understand your meaning. The quality of your responses in
classroom discussions is a critical way for you to demonstrate that you fully
comprehend the course materials. Please note that "I agree" and
"Yes, that's an important point" are not substantive responses by
themselves. Quality responses demonstrate your degree of understanding by
expanding on the original statement. The quality of your participation in
classroom discussions counts toward your class participation grade. Correct grammar, punctuation,
spelling, and sentence structure are expected in your assignments. However,
these standards are not as strict in conferences, as the style there is more
informal and "conversational." You are, however, encouraged to
proofread all messages before you post, in order to ensure that they are
readable. Your grade will be determined by
individual contributions. Except as
noted above, all of your submissions will be graded on relevance,
comprehensiveness, specificity, clarity, and analytical skills, as well as
the writing skills that you demonstrate. |
|
|
|
Email
Policy: |
|
|
|
With the exception of MOL
students, all FCC students will receive and are expected to use their FCC
email address for correspondence with faculty and staff at the college.
Students can establish and access their FCC email accounts at https://myfcc.frederick.edu.
Email is an instructional tool essential to student-instructor and
student-student communication. In the Blackboard environment by default, your
email address is available to all students in this course. However, students are permitted to
use email addresses of other students in this course only for the purpose and
the duration of this course. The instructor can be expected to
respond to regular student email inquiries (grades, posted assignments, and
tests excluded) within the time frame of 24 to 48 hours. |
|
Academic Integrity: |
|
|
|
Work in this course is subject to
the provisions of the FCC Code of Academic Integrity. Plagiarism in any form
will not be tolerated. As a student, it is your job to practice academic
honesty at ALL times. Make sure that
all sources, particularly Internet sources, get proper credit for quotations,
paraphrases, and ideas. More information about this and the Student Conduct
Code are available at http://www.frederick.edu/student_services/studentpolicies.aspx |
|
You must send your Academic
Integrity Pledge to the instructor. The form is available at http://courses.frederick.edu/_utilities/regform.htm |
|
Topical Outline (ONLINE COURSES) |
|
Class |
Date |
Subject |
Content |
|
1 |
1/30 |
Introduction
to course What is
Criminal Justice? |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
2 |
2/6 |
The
Crime Picture, Criminal Law and The Search for Causes |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
3 |
2/13 |
Criminal
Law |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
4 |
2/20 |
History
and Structure of Policing and Purpose and Organization |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
5 |
2/27 |
Policing
- Legal Aspects and Issues and Challenges |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
6 |
3/5 |
The
Courts – Structure and Participants and |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
7 |
3/12 |
Pretrial
activities and Sentencing AND Sentencing Mid Term
Exam 3/19 to
3/25 Spring Break |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
8 |
3/26 |
Corrections
– Probation, Parole and Community Corrections AND Prison Life |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
9 |
4/2 |
Prisons
and Jails |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
10 |
4/9 |
Juvenile
Justice |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
11 |
4/16 |
Drugs
and Crime |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
12 |
4/23 |
Terrorism
and Multinational Criminal Justice |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
13 |
4/30 |
The
Future of Criminal Justice |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
14 |
5/7 |
Wrap up
and Review |
Reading/Assignments
|
|
15 |
5/14 |
Take
on-line exam |
Reading/Assignments
|